After 10 years of marriage, the cheating police has got its fingers pointed at the father of two and are not leaving any of the sordid details of his online alter egos “wannaseeall” and “happyladdie2002″. Brinkley claims that his $3,000 a month porn site habit has led him to physically betraying her with his 18 year old assistant, Diana Bianchi. And, to think that he played that card “you’re not going to believe that man over me, are you?” after the couple was confronted by Diana’s stepfather, a police officer. Shame on you Peter Cook!
Wouldn’t want to be him walking down his neighborhood streets, especially when everyone now knows that Brinkley found internet conversations of “him trying to lure girls, saying he would take them shopping, saying he would pay them if he could see their face” and other evidence that reveals Cook has been broadcasting himself into cyberspace masturbating. Brinkley just couldn’t believe that the man she married turned out to be a big sleaze.
He should think twice about leaving his current girlfriend Suzanne Shaw for (ahem) younger pastures, because once the media is done chewing him up for breakfast and spitting him out, no woman out there would want to touch him no matter how much money he’s got in his bank account.
Revenge, is definitely best served cold.
One thing the internet has uncovered is the incredibly huge number of men (women as well)who want porn, get porn, and pay for porn! The days of the magazine delivered in a plain brown envelope are definitely over; porn is at anyone’s fingertips. Who can tell how many marriages and relationships have crumbled due to internet porn?
By the same token, I wonder how many venereal diseases weren’t brought home because of the safe outlet?
When you look at the affair Peter Cook had, I think you have to conclude that he must hate Christie.
What type of person takes the other woman to a home owned by the wife?
That was just cruel!
Sagemother, A man that doesn’t think would do that, or a man that thinks with his pants.
It is very sad but they would be well advised not to deal with their dirty washing in public. The relationship may be over but she doesn’t need to lose her dignity as well.
Liza,
Fellows count on women believing they don’t plan to humilate them the way Christie was humiliated by this fellow. It is how they justify their attitude once they are caught.
It becomes her fault because she accurately interpreted his actions as a form of hatred.
Gossip columns are always looking for juicy news to write about so it’s hard for persons in the limelight to actually keep their private lives a secret.
Lisa I agree that it is hard for celebrities to keep their private lives private, but many don’t even try, they seek publicity annd any headline is better than no publicity. We are the biggest fools for reading all the junk that the gossip column’s churn out.
Didn’t she marry him because she was pregnant? It’s kind of obvious that he thought he was God’s gift and handsome as hell. He probably thought that he was doing Christie a favour!
I hope that, during the next decade, people won’t be so quick to voice disapproval when these divorces go public.
Silence keeps women at a disadvantage.
mollyL, and the sad thing about it is…. because of the availability of the internet, it’s not only porn that does the marriage wrong….
There are social networking sites where people can hook up that specialize in folks who are looking for extra marital affairs…..
Stuff like this makes you kind of wonder to whatever happened to our society’s morals. Are we really just a bunch of emotionally depraved people that we’ll try to get it anyway we want?
SageMother, you really can’t bring VD home. But I honestly think that porn on line is just one step behind the actual “doing of the deed” and that it’s just a matter of time before that next step is taken.
Imaginary Diva, I may have agreed with you once, but I have come to understand that to some people looking at porn is just that - looking. It is not necessarily one step away from ‘doing the deed’. Of cours it can still have a devastating impact on the partner if they see it as a betrayal of trust.
SageMother, what an egotistic bastard. It’s a good thing he settled and let her have the kids or else they might turn up like him!
Liza, I think you mean to say:
… a man that thinks with his pants ….. OFF!
justontime, I think she made the right choice by taking him to court. And I’m sure if she had the choice she would have taken the papparazzi out of her divorce proceeding.
From what I understand is that he was asking for full custody of the kids which meant she had to pay him alimony for keeping them. Because of her taking him to court and airing out their dirty laundry, she was able to keep the kids and he settled instead.
This was all about how much money he could milk from her.
SageMother, hatred comes in all forms, and in his case….. he just is in for every last cent that he can get from her.
Liza, I think celebrities give up their right to privacy once they hitched their hooks into the hollywood bandwagon.
Justontime, people are really buying into celebrities bad deeds and most of them do believe that the notoriety of being bad just keeps their name alive.
Leave a Reply